As a historian, you have trouble writing objectively about the present because you are too close to what's happening around you. It is only in hindsight...when the data is laid out...that one can look at the evidence and easily and accurately determine what happened. With that in mind, I'd like to expose the biggest disaster in logical thinking in modern history, understanding that I'm not blaming you for ignorance to this point, but asking you to follow me as I walk you through some irrefutable evidence. Prepare to be mortified, angry, and...then hopefully...determined.
Recently, here in Arkansas, a House Bill was introduced that would eliminate both religious AND philosophical exemptions to vaccination... following in the footsteps of California (who are on the verge of forfeiting ALL parental rights). The Representative who put forth this bill began receiving phone calls and emails...testimonies, if you will...from parents who cannot or will not vaccinate their children. After several days, this was her response:
I'd like to direct your attention to the line,"There appear to be valid arguments on both sides of the issue."
It is only the pro-vaccine community that dismiss other viewpoints.
Those on the side of vaccine skepticism have ALWAYS validated the concerns on both sides. Understand that we ALL only want what is best for our children. IF we DIDN'T have valid concerns, why would we risk our children's well being?! It DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.After only a few days of listening, our representative began to understand.
What ARE those valid arguments? Why do the pediatricians REFUSE to discuss the independent science surrounding vaccines? ...Perhaps it is because logic ends where coverup begins...
What if I told you that vaccines didn't stop polio, measles, and other diseases from spreading?!
DON'T STOP READING!!!
Listen to my logic...
What about the diseases that went away without vaccines?! Those time periods coincide not with a vaccine, but with clean water, indoor plumbing, and better hygiene. Let's take a look at rates of illnesses and when the vaccines were introduced:
HEAR THIS WELL:
I am not against the idea of vaccination!
However, I am unwilling to ignore facts that make simple logical sense.
Most of the world ..unfortunately... is currently at risk of being part of the collateral damage from the logical trainwreck.
Logical Trainwreck: Vaccines are perfectly safe and everyone should get them without question and on time.
Why this is wrongy wrongerson in 5 logical reasons:
1. People are NOT one size fits all. Some people are allergic to eggs, some to artificial color, some to penicillin. ALL of those things are in the inocculations your baby gets when they get vaccinated. Clearly, some people shouldn't get them on those grounds. We don't feed babies peanut butter for fear of an allergic reaction...but we inject them with this stuff?!
2. Many people have autoimmune disorders. We may or may not know which babies have them. Regardless, a baby's immune system is not fully developed. To vaccinate a baby is to inject live viruses and illnesses directly into their bloodstream.
3. We REMOVED formaldehyde from biology classrooms everywhere when we realized it was a carcinogen (a cancer causer). Yet, we inject this substance...the one we couldn't touch or breathe in high school....into a newborn.
4. Virtually ANY amount of mercury is considered toxic by the CDC. The legal "safe" amount of mercury is 2ppb (parts per billion) in water, according to the EPA. Can you believe how much is injected directly into your bloodstream when you get a flu shot?! Try 51,000 ppb
Also, before someone says," It isn't the same type of mercury...You are correct. Methyl mercury is what is found in fish. Ethyl mercury is what is found in a flu shot... This is what the pharmaceutical companies say:
BUT
Here is what independent experts say:
There is a definitive conflict of interest here. It's not easy to figure out who is right....but let's look at the evidence:
Still not convinced?! The science isn't settled...at all. (Despite what the CDC says)
Here are some links to quality studies showing the dangers of vaccines:
...and not all doctors believe that there isn't a link... Dr. Bob Sears and Dr. Rachael from the hit show The Doctors both advocate slowing down or avoiding vaccines completely. Here is a list of other doctors who question vaccines.
"There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good." "The manufacturers of these vaccines know they are worthless but they go on selling them anyway." - Dr J Anthony Morris, PhD (Former Chief Vaccine Control Officer and Research Virologist, US FDA)
"There are unanswered questions about vaccine safety... No one should be threatened by the pursuit of this knowledge." "I think public health officials have been too quick to dismiss the hypothesis as irrational without sufficient studies of causation." - Dr Bernadine Healy, MD (Former Director, National Institute of Health and Former President, American Red Cross)
"Crib death was so infrequent in the pre-vaccination era that it was not even mentioned in the statistics, but it started to climb in the 1950s with the spread of mass vaccination." - Dr Harris L Coulter, PhD
"Vaccination is the single most prevalent and most preventable cause of infant deaths."- Dr Viera Scheibner, PhD
"The only safe vaccine is one that is never used." Dr James A Shannon, MD (Former Director, National Institutes of Health)
"We are setting up the younger generation for a potential calamity. Vaccines build up only one line of your immune system (the antibody system) but put the main immune system (cellular immunity) to sleep. You need both for fully developed immunity." - Dr Robert Rowen, MD
"There are unanswered questions about vaccine safety... No one should be threatened by the pursuit of this knowledge." "I think public health officials have been too quick to dismiss the hypothesis as irrational without sufficient studies of causation." - Dr Bernadine Healy, MD (Former Director, National Institute of Health and Former President, American Red Cross)"Crib death was so infrequent in the pre-vaccination era that it was not even mentioned in the statistics, but it started to climb in the 1950s with the spread of mass vaccination." - Dr Harris L Coulter, PhD
"Vaccination is the single most prevalent and most preventable cause of infant deaths."- Dr Viera Scheibner, PhD
"The only safe vaccine is one that is never used." Dr James A Shannon, MD (Former Director, National Institutes of Health)
"We are setting up the younger generation for a potential calamity. Vaccines build up only one line of your immune system (the antibody system) but put the main immune system (cellular immunity) to sleep. You need both for fully developed immunity." - Dr Robert Rowen, MD
5. When they removed SOME (not all) of the mercury in SOME vaccines, they replaced it with aluminum. Now, if you look at the CDC website, you find out that very little is known about aluminum exposure...and it has never been properly studied as a substance to be injected into the bloodstream. (In fact, vaccines don't even undergo the same amount of study as other pharmaceutical drugs)(There has NEVER been a double blind placebo study with a vaccine)... The government did a study on aluminum mixed with mercury, though... Spoiler: Apparently, it increases the problems exponentially...
Here's the summation and link:
"Summing up: Rigorous and replicable studies (in different animal species) have shown evidence of EtHg, and of Al toxicities. More research attention has been given to EtHg and findings have showed a solid link with neurotoxic effects in humans; however, the potential synergic effect of both toxic agents has not been properly studied. Therefore, early life exposure to both EtHg and Al deserves due consideration."
BONUS: Can we talk for a moment about aborted fetal cells in vaccines?! If you are anti abortion, why is it okay to inject your baby with another baby? Is that the cause for sudden outburst of autoimmune disorders?
ARE YOU MAD yet? You should be... Why would people roll the dice with YOUR children?! Follow the MONEY...
Do you know that your pediatrician gets money from insurance companies for vaccinating their patients?
That means, if YOUR child is immuno-compomised and shouldn't get vaccinated...but they are that hinge patient between 62-63%... the doctor has 40,000 conflicts of interest.
So... Let's break it down. Here is what we know:
1. Not every kid should be vaccinated.
2. Not every kid should follow the same schedule.
3. There are very real side effects that come with vaccines that your doctor will/ has...at best ...glossed over. Why is that? Out of the 6500ish pages your doctor reads in medical school, about 20 are on vaccines...and most of that is how to administer them on schedule and argue with parents who don't comply. Unless they went and researched on their own time, your doctor knows very little about vaccines.
4. Vaccines can and DO cause autism.... and an array of other issues. From eczema to diabetes to autoimmune disorders...the VICP (vaccine injury compensation program) pays out millions in tax dollars every year to families who have been damaged by vaccines. Why doesn't the pharmaceutical company have to pay for it? Watch this cool video by Rob Schneider:
5. The science isn't settled. The doctors who stand up against mandatory vaccines face everything from criticism to the loss of their medical license. They gain very little. They have no logical reason other than the protection of children to fight this battle.
6. Right now, the CDC has openly been accused of FRAUD concerning vaccine safety studies... They have a whistleblower with 10,000 hard documents PROVING scientific fraud! However, big pharmaceutical companies' payouts run deep...They own so many congressmen (and women), they can't get Congress to subpoena him. His information is what the controversial documentary Vaxxed: From Coverup to Catastrophe is all about. I urge you to see it.
Since then, a GROUP of scientists have come forward with this letter:
Carmen S. Villar, MSW Chief of Staff Office of the Director MS D14 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, Georgia 303294027
August 29, 2016
Dear Ms. Villar:
We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right. We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health. We would like to see high ethical standards and thoughtful, responsible management restored at CDC. We are asking that you do your part to help clean up this house! It is puzzling to read about transgressions in national media outlets like USA Today, The Huffington Post and The Hill. It is equally puzzling that nothing has changed here at CDC as a result. It’s business as usual. The litany of issues detailed over the summer are of particular concern: Recently, the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) has been implicated in a “cover up” of inaccurate screening data for the Wise Woman (WW) Program. There was a coordinated effort by that Center to “bury” the fact that screening numbers for the WW program were misrepresented in documents sent to Congress; screening numbers for 2014 and 2015 did not meet expectations despite a multimillion dollar investment; and definitions were changed and data “cooked” to make the results look better than they were. Data were clearly manipulated in irregular ways. An “internal review” that involved staff across CDC occurred and its findings were essentially suppressed so media and/or Congressional staff would not become aware of the problems. Now that both the media and Congresswoman DeLauro are aware of these issues, CDC staff have gone out of their way to delay FOIAs and obstruct any inquiry. Shouldn’t NCCDPHP come clean and stop playing games? Would the ethical thing be to answer the questions fully and honestly. The public should know the true results of what they paid for, shouldn’t they? 1 Another troubling issue at the NCCDPHP are the adventures of Drs. Barbara Bowman and Michael Pratt (also detailed in national media outlets). Both seemed to have irregular (if not questionable) relationships with CocaCola and ILSI representatives. Neither of these relationships were necessary (or appropriate) to uphold our mission. Neither organization added any value to the good work and science already underway at CDC. In fact, these ties have now called into question and undermined CDC’s work. A cloud has been cast over the ethical and excellent work of scientists due to this wanton behavior. Was cultivating these relationships worth dragging CDC through the mud? Did Drs. Bowman and Pratt have permission to pursue these relationships from their supervisor Dr. Ursula Bauer? Did they seek and receive approval of these outside activities? CDC has a process by which such things should be vetted and reported in an ethics review, tracking and approval system (EPATS). Furthermore, did they disclose these conflicts of interest on their yearly OGE 450 filing. Is there an approved HHS 520, HHS 521 or “Request for Official Duty Activities Involving an Outside Organization” approved by Dr. Bauer or her Deputy Director Ms. Dana Shelton? An August 28, 2016 item in The Hill details these issues and others related to Dr. Pratt. It appears to us that something very strange is going on with Dr. Pratt. He is an active duty Commissioned Corps Officer in the USPHS, yet he was “assigned to” Emory University for a quite some time. How and under what authority was this done? Did Emory University pay his salary under the terms of an IPA? Did he seek and receive an outside activity approval through EPATS and work at Emory on Annual Leave? Formal supervisor endorsement and approval (from Dr. Bauer or Ms. Shelton) is required whether done as an official duty or outside activity. If deemed official, did he file a “Request for Official Duty Activities Involving an Outside Organization” in EPATS? Apparently Dr. Pratt’s position at Emory University has ended and he has accepted another position at the University of California San Diego? Again, how is this possible while he is still an active duty USPHS Officer. Did he retire and leave government service? Is UCSD paying for his time via an IPA? Does he have an outside activity approval to do this? Will this be done during duty hours? It is rumored that Dr. Pratt will occupy this position while on Annual Leave? Really? Will Dr. Pratt be spending time in Atlanta when not on Annual Leave? Will he make an appearance at NCCDPHP (where he hasn’t been seen for months). Most staff do not enjoy such unique positions supported and approved by a Center Director (Dr. Bauer). Dr. Pratt has scored a sweet deal (not available to most other scientists at CDC). Concerns about these two positions and others were recently described in The Huffington Post and The Hill. His behavior and that of management surrounding this is very troubling. Finally, most of the scientists at CDC operate with the utmost integrity and ethics. However, this “climate of disregard” puts many of us in difficult positions. We are often directed to do things we know are not right. For example, Congress has made it very clear that domestic funding for NCCDPHP (and other CIOs) should be used for domestic work and that the bulk of NCCDPHP funding should be allocated to program (not research). If this is the case, why then is NCCDPHP taking domestic staff resources away from domestic priorities to work on global health issues? Why in FY17 is NCCDPHP diverting money away from program priorities that 2 directly benefit the public to support an expensive research FOA that may not yield anything that benefits the public? These actions do not serve the public well. Why is nothing being done to address these problems? Why has the CDC OD turned a blind eye to these things. The lack of respect for science and scientists that support CDC’s legacy is astonishing. Please do the right thing. Please be an agent of change.
Respectfully,
CDC Spider (CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research)
Cc: CDC Ethics Office
This is quickly coming to a crossroads. Where do you want to be? Would you rather put YOUR kids at risk, or are you willing to fight for their rights both now and in the future. They are being used as guinea pigs in an Earth sized laboratory. It's time to stand up. As Del Bigtree, producer of VaxXed would say," It's time to BE BRAVE."
Want to know how to get involved?! Contact me!
No comments:
Post a Comment